Whichever one was resulting in the best copy!
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux
(540) 242 0911
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Try Spot for OS X, the intelligent DXCluster Client at
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com - $15.99
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft.com> wrote:
> Which profile were you using in MMTTY?
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neal Campbell [mailto:nealk3nc@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:13 PM
> To: Dave AA6YQ
> Cc: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Best program
>
>
> For abt 6 months I ran with an ST8000, RITTY and MMTTY in parallel (as
> much as possible because the configuration problems were horrible).
> While each demodulator would occasionally copy things that the other
> wouldn't, I felt that MMTTY was consistently best, with RITTY a close
> second, then ST8000.
>
> I stopped running RITTY because the performance wasn't worth the
> maintenance of the configuration. If it was demonstrably better, it
> would have been worth it but it wasn't.
>
>
> Neal Campbell
> Abroham Neal Software
> Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux
> (540) 242 0911
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try Spot for OS X, the intelligent DXCluster Client at
> www.abrohamnealsoftware.com - $15.99
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>AA6YQ comments below
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
>> Behalf Of Charles Morrison
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:06 PM
>> To: rtty@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Best program
>>
>>
>> >From an end user's perspective, and keeping in mind the unfortunate
> decision
>> of K6STI to discontinue the production of his application, Chen, why has
> no
>> other PC based application compared? Has anyone contacted Brian and asked
>> him if he'd consider releasing the information that he used to create his
>> application so that someone else could pick up his torch?
>>
>>>>>I have spoken at length with Brian, and found him completely unwilling.
>> The piracy of RITTY and the negative reaction to his attempts to eliminate
>> that piracy have not left Brian in a charitable mood with respect to
> amateur
>> radio. He was also skeptical that RITTY could be made to work correctly
>> under the Windows scheduler.
>>
>> Like Chen says, we keep hearing about how far superior RITTY is/was. With
>> the increase in computer usage, power, and knowledge, has no one attempted
>> to compete with Brian? Dave, would that help you in improving MMTTY?
>>
>>>>>Certainly.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Dave, AA6YQ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.10.14/1918 - Release Date: 1/27/2009
> 7:26 AM
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|