RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RU Practice

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RU Practice
From: Ron DeBlock <rdeblock@att.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:30:54 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
It's real regulation.  The RTTY and Data allocation changed on Dec 15, 
2006 when the voice allocations were expanded.

For USA stations, RTTY IS NOT PERMITTED ABOVE 3.6 MHz.  See the FCC 
regulations 97.305(c).  Note that 80m is defined as 3.50 to 3.60 MHz in 
97.301  (they didn't make it easy to read).

The ARRL website has the latest regulations dated Feb 20, 2007.  There 
are other websites that have copies over 10 years old - make sure you 
are reading the current rules.

73,
Ron KR2D

john wrote:
 > uhhh, have we not been banished above 3600??  is that a band plan 
thing, or a real regulation??
 > 73 john
 >
 > Junior wrote:
 >> 38 Q's 25 Multipliers
 >> Stayed on 80m testing out the shortened dipole at 300watts.
 >> Seems to work well into all W areas.
 >> Thanks also to Goetz, DJ3IW , for the lone DX ctc. A few others 
called but
 >> could not get the exchange.
 >> Psk, Hell and Olivia was on 3580-3586 or so. Don't forget to check below
 >> 3580 above 3600 during the test. Still looking for AK for the last 
state on
 >> 80m.
 >> 73's & 88's ( I have worked four YL's the last few months ).
 >> charles/kk5oq
 >>
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> RTTY mailing list
 >> RTTY@contesting.com
 >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
 >>
 >>
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > RTTY mailing list
 > RTTY@contesting.com
 > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
 >

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>