RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] LOTW

To: '"John Becker, WØJAB"' <w0jab@big-river.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] LOTW
From: "Eric - VE3GSI" <ve3gsi@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: ve3gsi@canada.com
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:29:36 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
John,

Not a thing wrong with using both - my station is 100% Card if requested and
I still use LoTW. With using LoTW only, I have the DXCC/Mixed and
WAS/Mixed/Rtty certificates, both without the services of a card checker.
The QSL ratio here is about 44% LoTW and 4% Paper out of my station log of
about 55,000 Q's. You can do the '$ math' if you wish.

With Torben's new call of 5P9X I show 4 LoTW QSLS, his original call of
OZ9GA show a total of 17 LoTW QSLs and 5 FB paper cards. Needless to say
quite a few Ops do use both methods of QSL confirmation, cards won't stop
coming just because you use Log of the World. You will find that RTTY Op's
are the best when it comes to using LoTW. 

GL hope to catch you in my log someday.

Eric - Ve3gsi



> -----Original Message-----
> From:"John Becker, WØJAB"
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] LOTW
> 
> What about a QSL card?
> That is the main reason I will not use LOTW.
> It seem to have replaced QSL cards.
> 
> At 07:42 PM 11/5/2008, you wrote:
> >Congrats, Torben!
> >
> >I worked you 11 times in 2005-2008. Have all your QSL's in LoTW.
> 



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>