N1MM can do the exchange either way. I set the exchange up to exactly
match the rules. The robot rejects the text.
Open up N1MM, change the exchange, and have it regenerate the log.
Now it matches what the robot wants.
It is not per say and issue with the rules, or the robot, but more of
a matter of the two groups talking and being on the same page.
David Wilburn
NM4M
Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> The Cabrillo spec is just that, a spec, that must be adhered to for
> scoring purposes. It must be followed to the letter. The robot can
> only score your log when it's in the proper format.
>
> Having said that, it seems like N1MM allows too much flexibility in
> programming the Sent exchange. Writelog asks for your state and zone
> separately (and independent of the RTTY send buffers). This allows the
> program to order them exactly the way Cabrillo expects, regardless of
> how you program your buffers, or what you send on the air.
>
> This seems like a failure in N1MM, not a failure in following the rules.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
> On 9/29/2008 1:50 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:54, Dick White <whiter26@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The Cabrillo checker apparently is asking for ZONE STATE while the rules say
>>> STATE ZONE. Easy to look at the rules and set up that way but not complying
>> What CQ needs to do is be consistent. I saw part of the thread on the
>> RST-ST-ZN issue, confirmed that it was the order called for in the
>> rules, and set my macro accordingly.
>>
>> And then the robot rejected my Cabrillo because it was "wrong". Not my
>> fault.
>>
>> I fixed it with sed, but most folks don't have that option and are
>> probably stuck doing it by hand.
>>
>> Fooey on CQ!
>>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|