Thanks for the explanation. It was right after the 599 and space. If
this is an issue interpreting letters and numbers, why is 599 correct,
and the 14 is not?
David Wilburn
NM4M
Kok Chen wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:45 PM, David Wilburn wrote:
>
>> I hit EE3R a couple of times. They kept sending QR for their section.
>
> Is this right after they sent 599 and a space? If so, it is possible
> that you have USOS set, and they didn't have it set.
>
> When that happens, that space character will cause your decoder to go
> to LTRS mode.
>
> If he is not running USOS, his state is still in FIGS mode after
> sending the space (the space character is present in both the LTRS and
> FIGS table).
>
> So, when he wants to send you the 1, he simply sends the Baudot 0x17,
> without having to send a FIGS first, after that, he sends a Baudot 0x0a.
>
> On your end, you have shifted gears to the LTRS set (because of
> USOS). So, when you receive the Baudot 0x17, you print the LTRS
> equivalent, which is a Q. The Baudot 0x0a is decoded into an R.
>
> So, he sends 14, and you receive QR.
>
> There is no need to panic. Just look at your keyboard (if you are
> using a regular QWERTY keyboard). Notice the row of QWERTYUIOP keys
> are under the numerics row 1234567890.
>
> In Baudot, Q and 1 shares a code character, W and 2 share another code
> character, E and 3 shares another code etc.
>
> When a noise pulse takes away FIGS characters, you often see a 599
> turn into a TOO. 73 turns into UE, etc.
>
> The good thing about USOS is that it provides a way to produce a
> cleaner text print -- you won't end up with a page full of numbers,
> when the other end is just sending text.
>
> The bad thing about USOS is that unless everybody uses it, it can
> often cause even more confused print -- especially in a FIGS rich
> environment (e.g., contest exchanges). USOS is a biased encoding that
> favors the LTRS shift (since SPACE implicitly maps to SPACE+LTRS).
>
> Asking the other end to resend will not help, since precisely the same
> sequence will repeat (Einstein defined as "insanity" as doing
> something repeatedly and expecting different outcomes -- this was
> before he bought into Quantum Mechanics :-).
>
> 73
> Chen, W7AY
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|