To: | "'David Wilburn'" <dave.wilburn@verizon.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY |
From: | "J. Edward \(Ed\) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com> |
Reply-to: | w0yk@msn.com |
Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:54:49 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
> My question is how do they usually CQ? CQ WW, or CQ Test, or CQ WW DX? > Seems like CQ WW makes the most sense. Just trying to get macro's > setup. Really looking forward to this weekend. Good question. CQ WW is enough and I even shorten it to just 'WW', partly because I want a 'CQ' and the end of the CQ message, e.g., WW DE P49X P49X CQ is my basic CQ, keeping it as short as possible. Other ops will have different opinions and approaches. 73, Ed - P49X (W0YK) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY, David Wilburn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY, Bill, W6WRT |
Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY, David Wilburn |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] CQ 'ing CQ WW RTTY, Bill, W6WRT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |