Bill,
Thanks. I will stay down around 1809. I can adjust the bw on the vertical
(coil) however.
73
Charles/kk5oq
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Gedking@aol.com
Cc: RTTY@contesting.com; w9ol@billnjudy.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty?
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:12:55 EST, Gedking@aol.com wrote:
>
>Yea but do it up on 1990
>ED K8OT
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
Why so high in the band? I suspect nearly all ops have their 160
antennas cut for low in the band so they can do CW DXing. The ARRL
bandplan calls for digital modes to be from 1800-1810. I would
suggest avoiding 1810 since that is also (unfortunately) the ARRL's
suggested QRP CW frequency.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|