RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] FW: Ethics

To: "RTTY Contesting" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] FW: Ethics
From: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:29:02 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
There are such things as having a non-involved impartial party to verify the
final results.

Dick  KS0M

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:17 PM
To: RTTY Contesting
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Ethics


ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:16:03 -0600, "Dick White"
<whiter26@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>I have no objection to contest managers and checkers participating in a
>contest and submitting a log.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Nobody would object until that day came when the log checker won a big
contest by a very narrow margin. Then, watch out.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RTTY] FW: Ethics, Dick White <=