RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY

To: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY
From: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:13:39 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I can confirm Scott's observation. I had a 756PRO for years and now a 
756PRO3 for the last 10 months, and either of them could decode RTTY 
as well and often better than MMTTY/others. I keep the RTTY decoder 
running all the time in the 756PRO3 as a backup decoder. It is 
unfortunate that we can't move that  decoder data into the computer 
easily. I would probably use it as the main decoder if I could 
interface the computer to that display.

Jerry W4UK

At 02:18 PM 10/3/2007, Scott Schultz wrote:
>I noticed the same differences by using the built-in RTTY decoder on my
>756Pro. As good as MMTTY is, the Pro's decoder sometimes did a better job of
>picking up some of the data, especially callsigns. Too bad I can't "cut and
>paste" from the rig to N1MM!
>
>Scott N0IU

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>