Very interesting and for the most part very reasonable. I think until
the world aligns around a 40m band definition, we will always have
problems there (when I lived in BE, it was very difficult to work 40
because its so tight and crowded).
The cw and ssb ops have had a bit of a free ride on their cqww
weekends but now that rtty is becoming so popular, they are feeling
the same pain as non-contesters feel on their weekends.
I agree with the comment that this is actually something to celebrate,
more hams on the air make a healthier ham radio.
Neal
On 10/2/07, Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> FYI, there is (or was) an ongoing discussion on the CQ Contest reflector
> regarding RTTY interference to the Texas QSO Party (mostly 40 meters).
>
> http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>
> Probably nothing new here, just something to be aware of.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C/0, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|