> I must have missed the post where someone was advocating
> denying top operators the right to participate against
> anyone.
You weren't paying attention to the demands that SO2R be made
a separate category (whether it be a separate category for
SO2R or a category for "SO1R ONLY" the effect is the same).
> Want a contest based on "skill, skill, skill?" Check with
> with NAQCC. Lets see, QRP power, CW, and basic wire antennas
> at the bottom of the sunspot cycle. Now there's a contest!
Not hardly - that's masochism. It's like trying to dig the
Grand Canyon with a tea spoon or repairing a HT with a blow
torch.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of billknn@aol.com
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:00 PM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 57, Issue 31
>
>
>
>
>
> "...If you would deny a certain group of top operators
> the right to participate against ALL single operator stations
> because one of the tools they choose is SO2R,..."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I must have missed the post where someone was advocating
> denying top operators the right to participate against
> anyone.
> Want a contest based on "skill, skill, skill?" Check with
> with NAQCC. Lets see, QRP power, CW, and basic wire antennas
> at the bottom of the sunspot cycle. Now there's a contest!
> 73 de KD5XN
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free
> AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|