Hi Tom and Others,
I worked at least 5 dupes in the CSS test this weekend, It takes less time
to work them than explain that they are a dupe. They might not have gotten
my call correct the first time we worked or ??
I also am of the old Pencil and Paper days when Dupes in the log not
accounted for counted against US but with putter logging and Cabrillo output
NOT A BIG DEAL
Rex K7QQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Cc: <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; <w7why@verizon.net>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] dupes
>> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:45:04 -0700
>> From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] dupes
>> To: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
>> Message-ID: <000c01c7e854$45eaa150$eec8fea9@Tom>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> Hi Mike
>>
>> Yes, there is a feature in N1MM Logger, 'work dupes', that just lets
>> you go
>> ahead and work the dupes. It just doesn't make any sense to hold up
>> everything to try and look up when the Q was supposed to happen, or
>> what the
>> exchange was. You can work another station or 2 while you are trying
>> to
>> figure out why it is a dupe.
>>
>> There is no penalty for working a dupe as long as it is marked in the
>> log.
>>
>> Just work 'em and go on. 73
>>
>> Tom W7WHY
>
> Tom,
>
> As many times as I've posted about this on 3830 and in this reflector, I
> would like to pose the question why this is even an issue? I don't use TR
> or N1MM, but if this is true, then why do these programs require you to
> apparently override a duplicate prevention scheme in the first place? Is
> this just in a RTTY contest that dupes don't count against you, or is it
> the
> same for all contests? This goes back to the question, what counts for
> less, working a dupe or having a NIL? I agree, if I work you again, its
> because you're not in my log, which means either you work a dupe, or get a
> NIL. Writelog notifies you if it's a dupe, but there's no warning or
> prevention for letting you enter it in the log. It just doesn't score any
> points.
>
> Don't get me started on the calls that do it REPEATEDLY as well, because
> no
> one has apparently been able to enlighten them of this fact yet.
>
> Charlie
> Ki5xp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.8/973 - Release Date: 8/25/2007
> 5:00 PM
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|