RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY Contest

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] BARTG HF RTTY Contest
From: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:15:58 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Just a reminder about the BARTG test this weekend, a few notes and a request 
for help.

The rules are on the BARTG website. Please have a look, but more important is 
to check that your log will be in the correct format, with all the right info 
in the right places and the correct contest name. This is important! Have a 
look at:
http://www.bartg.demon.co.uk/Contests/cabrillo.htm

You need to have the name as BARTG-RTTY and 3 columns of times in the log. No 
problem for Writelog users but what about N1MM? I need a few sample logs 
quickly from N1MM users to make sure the latest version of the software is 
producing the right logs.

Please make sure your entry has the class and your call in the e-mail header 
e.g. GW4SKA SOAB. The new 'family friendly' 6 hour class is headed SOAB6.

Apologies for the delay with the BARTG 2007 Sprint results. They are complete 
and with our webmaster but he had an accident, broke some ribs and is finding 
typing a bit hard!

There will be some analysis of RTTY contest software used for the Sprint test 
in a couple of weeks. I can tell you that we had 182 entrants using MixW, 145 
using N1MM, 106 using Writelog, 55 RCK, 29 RTCL, 24 MMTTY (for the contest 
log), 9 AAlog and about 70 unknown or various other software. Almost all the 
MixW logs were incorrectly formatted or named .. these were individually edited 
but will be rejected in future. We get no problems with Writelog, RCK or RTCL 
logs as long as the correct contest is selected. N1MM has the jury out at the 
moment.

Thanks for supporting our contest. See you on the screen this weekend.

John GW4SKA
BARTG Contest Manager
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>