Phil,
there's been allot of chatter in the past on the spider cluster list
about just that, and the general consensus is..
it bad.
there is some code, or back bone traffic between cluster computers that
are identifying a "self spotter"
and telling its neibour about it, iv seen it, in what form or how its
looking at a "self spotter" i don't know,
and im really afraid on starting that thread again
so in some sense cluster computers are dealing with this issue, what is
the penalty i don't know if any,
but i believe this problem/feature is starting to be addressed...
Tony
NN1D
pcooper wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Interesting as the debate is regarding what/whether/why to spot, but the fact
> is this is getting away from the thoughts behind the original post.
>
> It started because there were one or two stations spotting everything they
> worked on a run frequency, thus causing the concern that this is some form of
> self spotting.
>
> It was suggested that N1MM might (and I will stress the MIGHT!!), under
> certain circumstances, allow this to happen "accidentally".
>
> The thread is NOT about who should spot why, or any kind of justification on
> what to spot, when, or how.
> It is about whether "SELF-SPOTTING" in any form is acceptable.
>
> So, let's not get on to personal thoughts behind what I will spot, as that is
> down to me, and my own conscience.
>
> 73 all
>
> Phil GU0SUP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|