RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station - summary

To: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station - summary
From: n1mgo@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:45:11 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Jeff,
    I use the ProII with the Astron SS-30 for rtty contesting, never 
had a problem in 2 and a half years of heavy rtty use at full power.
I don't see the roofing filter as a problem, even on 20mtrs when it 
is very crowded during a big contest.  I don't win, usually running 
SO1R, but have got very good scores in most rtty contests.  I have 
taken my ProII and ss-30 on many trips to VT, ME and Field day, for 
rtty contests, very compact for a very capable system.

Gordon - N1MGO

On 19 Jul 2006 at 17:18, Jeff Stai wrote:

> 
> hi - thanks very much to everyone for the many great responses!!!
> 
> The votes were overwhelmingly in favor of the IC756ProIII. The band scope 
> (which I have never used) and the twin peak filter are especially intriguing. 
> The need for 12V supply means I might still be hauling around the same mass, 
> but at least in two parts with less desk space required. This is good.
> 
> Question: Is anyone using this rig with a switcher like the Astron SS-30 and 
> does it work OK?
> 
> Another concern is the roofing filter on the ProIII, being 15KHz. That seems 
> pretty wide. One of the best things I ever did was install the 4KHz InRad 
> roofing filter in the 1000Ds. Splatter problems from noisy nearby stations 
> (especially those dang robots) are simply a thing of the past. I am totally 
> spoiled by this. The recommendations I have received from top stations are 
> compelling, but I would sure like to understand how the ProIII does so well 
> with that wide of a filter. If I look at lab comparisons the ProIII is only 
> above average, but I understand there can be more to that picture.
> 
> Individual votes also for the TS-570DG and TS-850 and IC706 and IC746Pro, and 
> a suggestion to look at the IC7000. I think there was some discussion away 
> from the 746 here, which I tend to agree with. Also, I would shy away from 
> the 706 because it is so small - I am not familiar with the rig but if things 
> I want to do quickly are buried in a menu system maybe I don't want that. I 
> would have a similar concern with the 7000 (along with the display size) 
> until I know more about it (but the price is nice!)
> 
> I am completely unfamiliar with the Kenwoods, but will keep them in mind. I 
> very much appreciate the recommendations. However, I am going to look into 
> this whole band scope thing first. I have had a couple discussions about that 
> lately and it seems worth looking into.
> 
> thanks again to everyone! - jeff wk6i
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>