RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] Requested 3 Enter key sequence for RTTY in WL

To: "Jerry Pixton" <jpixton@shentel.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] Requested 3 Enter key sequence for RTTY in WL
From: "Wayne Matlock" <k7wm61@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k7wm61@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:15:26 -00
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Has anyone looked at right mouse clicking the rttyrite/cw window and seeing
if the menu that comes up there will satisfy demands. If you put the %L on
the end of the "tu qrz" button, you can do all from there and never take
your hand off the mouse...73 de

Wayne, k7wm@arrl.net


> [Original Message]
> From: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
> To: James Sullivan <jims@psws.com>; <writelog@contesting.com>
> Date: 4/13/2006 1:08:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Requested 3 Enter key sequence for RTTY in WL
>
> Jim,
>
> I am not arguing against the request. I made it many years ago also.
>
> I am only saying that there is more to the problem then having the cursor 
> not move when I click on a call but still move when I click on part of a 
> report. The "expected" behavior from Writelog is for the cursor to move. 
> That is what we have all learned will happen when we click on data. To 
> suddenly break this expected behavior just to use the "Enter send..." 
> functions needs some careful thinking through. It is not simple because
it 
> ripples everywhere!
>
> I too have spent much time trying to understand the behavior of the
"Enter 
> sends..." and why it doesn't work with a mouse. I also would like to just 
> click thru the whole qso without moving my mouse any further than the
call 
> and the report.
>
> I too run a SO2R station and am working hard to reduce inefficient hand 
> movement so as to increase my rate. I too have mapped the "scroll wheel"
to 
> the Enter key and tried that.
>
> I too would like to see an "Enter sends..." function that works. But 
> without breaking the expected behaviors of all the other function keys.
>
> Think thru and try what happens when you are using the other keys (not 
> Enter) to try to send an exchange and the cursor is in the wrong field - 
> that is not where you expected it. Most of the time you mouse click
garbage 
> over you call entry field because it might be alpha numeric (and how many 
> stations send numbers and text all together)
>
> Most of us remove the RST field after the call field just because when
the 
> cursor stops there instead of in the Report field we screw up.
>
> I am just saying "Be careful, there is a sand trap there". Your well laid 
> out key sequence has inconsistent behavior for the cursor when I happen
to 
> use the Enter key vs happen to use some other key to send a message. We
all 
> get quicker when things behave the way we expect EVERY time.
>
> We want to be able to use the Enter Key AND all the other keys at the
same 
> time - not switch in and out of an "Enter Sends..." mode. It is bad
enough 
> to learn to use a Shift-Enter to "log" (instead of Enter) without having 
> all the other keys change behavior when I what to use the "Enter sends..."
>
> BTW the 1st and 3rd states of "Enter sends" work right now - you just
have 
> to do something different to send the report. A mouse that has more
buttons 
> (I have a five button mouse) works to do that. I can send a full run 
> sequence without removing my hand from the mouse and not move the mouse
to 
> the Fkeys panel.
>
> I think I pointed out that possibly one way to achieve a solution would
be 
> to look to see if you have a call sign in the Call field (even when the 
> cursor is in the report field) and send the "run" report. And then move
to 
> next state which sends the qrz message (don't know if the validity of the 
> report fields needs to be checked here or just leave that to the logging 
> function as it is now). Right now it seems that the position of the
cursor 
> is what triggers a state change for the "Enter sends" function.  I think 
> this is the dependency that must be removed in order for the "Enter 
> sends..." function to work without breaking the other key's behavior.
>
> Jerry, W6IHG
>
>
>
> At 09:41 PM 4/12/2006 -0700, James Sullivan wrote:
> >Tnx to K0XU and W6IHG for their comments.
> >
> >As far as Fkeys goes it is a nice application.
> >However, my requested change will benefit WL in a High qso rate RTTY SO2R
> >contest.
> >When you are trying to interleave QSOs on 2 radios you need to really
> >minimize your mouse and hand movement.
> >My requested change eliminates use of the keyboard while running
stations in
> >SO2R or SO1R.
> >After hitting the left mouse button, I only have to press the Mouse wheel
> >switch to send the exchange.
> >I do not have to move the mouse from RttyView to the Fkey window. The
mouse
> >does not have to move
> >
> >Jerry, there is no sand trap because I am in 'Enter sends Exchange/QRZ"
> >MODE.
> >My Mouse wheel switch is mapped to the Enter key.
> >Pressing the wheel switch proceeds to send the message mapped to the
> >'SendCallExchangeKey' from the WL [Configuration].
> >This MODE auto-advances the cursor to the Received exchange field for
> >grabbing via the mouse.....
> >
> >This request is not noise. I am only asking for an optional ini entry to
> >allow the 3 Enter key sequence to work in rtty.
> >You can continue to use WL the way you want but you won't be able to use
the
> >3 Enter keys without this requested change.
> >
> >Jim W7EJ
> >
> > >Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Requested 3 Enter key sequence for RTTY in WL
> > >To: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>, writelog@contesting.com
> > >Cc: writelog@contesting.com
> > >Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20060412111229.02cb0fa0@pop.shentel.net>
> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> >
> > >Jim, et al
> >
> > >Yes, I use Fkeys about 90% of the time. But I find having other
> > >"convenient" keys mapped to the response sequence restful to the
fingers.
> >
> > >I have been pointing out for a long time that the rtty behaviour for
the
> > >"Enter" function was broken because the cursor moves to the next field
when
> >
> > >you mouse click a call.
> >
> > >However, I think there may be a "sand trap" here. What is being asked
is
> > >"Don't move to the next field after entering a call using the left
mouse
> > >button". This means when you next click on the report, the cursor is
still
> > >in the call field and you garbage the call with a report.
> >
> > >Think about this before too much noise is made.
> >
> > >Jerry, W6IHG
> >
> >---
> >[This E-mail Scanned for viruses by Online Northwest]
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >WriteLog mailing list
> >WriteLog@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> >WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs LLC
> http://www.pixos.com/designs/RadioTuner/
> jpixton@shentel.net
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] Requested 3 Enter key sequence for RTTY in WL, Wayne Matlock <=