To: | radioman@frpd.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V |
From: | af2c@njdxa.org |
Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:10:18 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I may be partial, but have found that the Butternut Antennas perform very
well and have performed well under the most adverse conditions for
DXepeditions and personal use. My secondary antenna is an HF9V here is Florida and have used it for all modes. It has withstood many hurricanes over the past decade. The Gap antennas reportedly have mixed reviews. You question has been posed on one the DX reflectors a number of times. Cushcraft Verticals are OK when it comes to ease of assembly, Field Day but all more of a compromise antenna than the others. 73, jay At 10:32 PM 2/13/06 -0500, you wrote: This is most likely not the list for this, BUT No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.7/259 - Release Date: 2/13/06 _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] WPX and strategy..., Sam Sorokin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RTTY] 3Y0X, Miquel Ángel EA3NB |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V, Ekki Plicht (DF4OR) |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |