RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert
From: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:32:21 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Thank you Bill! You get it.

So Bob K0RC, now you can make your official tally 2 for those who think the
acceptable percentage of League officials using LOTW should be 100%.

I still stand by my statement that only one module is fully functional -
DXCC. Who told you that it was a general purpose logging program? LoTW isn't
really a logbook at all, it is an award submission vehicle. It assumes you
already use a logging program that can convert its format into ADIF which
can then be converted into the LoTW submission format.

Scott NØIU

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
<rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert


> QSLing is so basic and so fundamental to Amateur Radio that all
> League officials should be expected to participate in LoTW. Even if
> it's only a few QSLs per year, their participation should be
> mandatory, and especially so for the Board of Directors since they
> have the ultimate control and supervision over the program. If a
> board member doesn't use it, how can he know how well or poorly it
> works and what needs fixing?
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>