----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
To: "'George Henry'" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>; <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments
>
> How absurd! If the average amateur cannot decode an interfering signal,
> how can he determine if the content is such that it NEEDS to be sent to
> the Commission for enforcement action (pornographic, commercial,
> intruder, etc.)?
>
If it's an INTERFERING signal, the CONTENT is irrelevant!!
> The Commission is not going to be bothered to decode every unique
> signal sent to them (if the protocol will survive recording) without
> a reason to believe that there is a basis for enforcement action.
>
Which interference is....
> Self- (or peer-) enforcement is based on the ability of the average
> amateur to know and react to what is right or wrong.
>
See above
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|