RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Our turn at a poll
From: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Reply-to: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:40:39 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Rick Mintz wrote:
>The end of the year always lets loose the pollsters for silliness such 
>as "Person of the Year", "Product of the Year", etc.  I think that it 
>is our turn, so...
>
>
>
 >When tuning RTTY signals, I use a.
 >
 >     (method)        (example)
 >
 >[X ]  Scope           (MMTTY software type)
 >
Mostly to look at signal quality (cleanness/fuzziness) but not as a 
tuning aid. I'm one of those latecomers to RTTY who was never forced to 
use the scope, but was already comfortable with FFT displays.

 >[ ]  Scope           (a real scope)
 >
 >[X ]  FFT display     (a la MMTTY)
 >
The main tuning aid (for me). With overlapping signals, the FFT seems 
like the only way to sort out which pairs of tones "belong together".

 >[ ]  LED bar graph   (PK-232)
 >
 >[ ]  LED x-y display (HAL DXP-38)
 >
 >[ ]  by Ear
 >
Still "in training".

 >[ ]  other           (specify)
 >


 >[ ]  I never have to tune. I only CQ.

:-)


 >
 >My primary decoder is:   (brand/model)
 >
MMTTY

 >
 >My secondary decoder is: (brand/model)
 >
Another instance of MMTTY with different settings.



-- 
73 from Ian GM3SEK
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>