RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 32, Issue 30

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 32, Issue 30
From: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: cfmorris@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:38:10 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Not at all Ed, I too want mine to be purely RTTY, no PSK, no Amtor..

The one thing that Don's survey did was show me just how bad I suck at
DX'ing and in sending and receiving QSL's.  With over 200 worked, I still
don't have enough to qualify for DXCC.. Yet..

Charlie
KI5XP
 


From: "Ed Magnuson" <w1mag@bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Big Shakeup on the Top Ten
To: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <002301c5a83c$a3552ea0$9a02a8c0@D6V9YV31>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
        reply-type=original

Your survey is a service, Don, and much appreciated. I have just one oddball
thought: for those  of us who prefer our RTTY awards to be pure, I wonder if
the order of the needed would change at all if the entities that have
appeared in recent years only on PSK were not counted?

Not looking for a fuss here. Just wondering if I am all alone in wanting my
digital credits to be RTTY only. I have no quarrel at all with those who
follow the rules and accept any digital QSOs of any type as wholly valid.

Ed, W1MAG 




_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 32, Issue 30, Charles Morrison <=