To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] RE: A little LOTW Gotcha |
From: | Ian White G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | Ian White G3SEK <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:00:50 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Bill Turner wrote:
Point taken, so let me rephrase: QSL's are apparently more of a security risk than mere cash. It's because the banks actually use two very different kinds of programmers for the same project. First come the ultra-cautious programmers who build the security systems. Almost by definition, these are not imaginative "people persons", and they are not good at writing user interfaces. So next the banks bring in a bunch of different programmers, who do have an instinct for the needs of users, and they write the interface that the users will see. It's a problem as old as computing itself. Both sets of programming skills are needed; but it's impossible for any one person to possess them both in full measure... and that second problem is as old as humanity. So far, LoTW has only had the first guy. It's as simple as that.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] A little LoTW gotcha, gdadx2 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RTTY] WPX RTTY Practice Thursday, Dean Wood |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RE: A little LOTW Gotcha, Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RE: A little LOTW Gotcha, Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |