I should answer this as Ive started this mess.
The reason that I asked about rst requirements by
arrl is that some folks work contests in order to work new countries/states
etc for awards by arrl and others..
Some folk were kind enough to explain that arrl does not require rst...
this is/was all I was asking, and appreciate the response that those folk
afforded me/us..
as for rst,, its useless--to my way of thinking, for contest purposes at
least--pitch and ditch it.
thanks everyone for you kindness in responding
73 john
----- Original Message -----
From: "K4SB" <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
To: "rtty-contesting" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 04:03
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Exchange of Signal Reports
> Dave Lee wrote:
> > From the current DXCC rules:
> > 4. Confirmation data for two-way communications must include the call
signs of
> > both stations, the Entity name as shown in the DXCC List, mode, and
date, time
> > and band. Except as permitted in Rule 1, cross-mode contacts are not
permitted
> > for DXCC credits. Confirmations not containing all required information
may be
> > rejected.
>
> Why quote DXCC rules when the discussion is about contests? If the
> sponsors say an RST is required, then either change the rules or
> comply.
>
> 73
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.4 - Release Date: 1/25/05
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.4 - Release Date: 1/25/05
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|