Some of us do. And, I've got to say, after listening to several days
of rtty FSK, the ears do appreciate the change to PSK.
And there are a bunch of clueful JA PSK ops.
73, doug
From: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:21:25 -0000
Content-description: Mail message body
Ty,
Maybe some of the "clueful" need to set an example on PSK. There's
no comparison for weak signal work. PSK blows Baudot out of the
water!
73,
Barry W2UP
On 16 Jan 2005 Tyler Stewart wrote:
> Say it aint so! hi!
>
> I havent run PSK/RTTY from DX since '01, but PSK sucked. It is slow
> and the operators are even slower and clueless.
>
> Ty K3MM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <K4FJ@aol.com>
> To: <RTTY@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 4:13 PM
> Subject: [RTTY] PSK Info
>
>
> > It looks like PSK is here to stay and many of the expeditions are
> > using it either instead of RTTY or in addition to RTTY. In other
> > words, I am getting the message to include it in my war chest.
> >
> > I would probably use MMTTY with Writelog, but I am interested in
> > reading up on how to operate PSK and how it works. Is there
> > available a good online source that you can recommend?
> >
> > 73, Steve, K4FJ
> >
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|