Well,
in the past years it did it based on callsign, as demonstrated
by those UA9 stations sending zone 17 while the scoring software
insisted them being zone 16: Result 0 points, contact not scored.
73 de Goetz
dj3iw@t-online.de
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Turner" <wrt@dslextreme.com>
To: <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: <Writelog@contesting.com>; <RTTY@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Country file corrections for CQWW RTTY
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:59:52 -0700 (PDT), Jim Reisert AD1C
<jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>I have noted the following callsign exceptions from the CQWW RTTY contest:
>
> 8J1RF (Antarctica)
> NL7AU (USA, Florida)
> NP3D (USA, New York)
>
>Any others that people noted? I can do a country file release this week to
fix
>these errors.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
_________________________________________________________
Maybe I'm worrying about nothing, but here's a line from my Cabrillo
file (with some spaces removed):
QSO: 14086 RY 2003-09-28 0330 W7TI 599 03 CA NP3D 599 5 NY
My question is, does the Cabrillo scoring assign the 1, 2, or 3 points
based on the callsign or on the zone/state? If it's the latter then
there is no problem; I'll just send it in. If it's the former, we
have a problem.
--
Bill, W7TI
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|