RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Post from WS7I

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Post from WS7I
From: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Sat Jan 25 22:41:07 2003
Forwarding this on request from Jay, WS7I...

> 
> Ty, penned, [BARTG]"...which is inconsequential since it's a relatively
> insignificant contest 
> of little interest to most serious competitors.  I predict it will stay
> that way."
> 
> "Tyler K3MM... Great Fun! One of the better RTTY contest of the year" BARTG
> results of  1997.  Ty was first in the U.S. that year. 
> 
> It's always interesting to talk about rule's, and rule changes.  Rules on
> the most part were made for a reason.  When rules are modified they do have
> vast implications.  But people -- in the case of the ARRL the MSC, always
> seem to "fix the rules". Mostly they tend to do it to make their contests
> the same.  But in doing so they always have far reaching implications.
> 
> But done is done as they say.  
> 
> It is interesting to see all of the rule changes that consistantly and
> constantly are discussed and taking place in other types of contests. e.g.
> changes in the 160 CQ to lower the number of hours, etc., etc.  No one
> seems too distressed about these changes which would of course also modify
> decade old records.  Fun thing about RTTY is that there is NO decade old
> record.  Each is usually changed yearly these days with all the increased
> participation.
> 
> I do take exception to comments about BARTG, it predates all of the U.S.
> RTTY contests, BARTG came long before CQ/DJ WW, WPX, ARRL RTTY Roundup. It
> has a very long and rich history, has a great committee and society behind
> it.  The craddles of RTTY contesting are BARTG,  CARTG, ANARTS, WAE, and
> VOLTA perhaps its best if we don't forget it. 
> 
> But back to rules. Fun to talk about but changes do have effects and adding
> more catagories is most often not possible. It add's plaques, certificates,
> and space in magazines.  Most often the changes don't increase
> participation, increase competitiveness, or really even make things better.
>  Take adding M2 to CQWW, Just another small catagory probably M/M should
> have been eliminated, but...don't look now.  M2 is now in all CQ contests,
> I believe.  Thought of by K5DJ, put in, and now its spread from RTTY to CW
> and SSB in CQWW. So keep on talking about changes you want, and keep on
> trying to convince someone else sometimes changes do happen.
> 
> My new rule change opinion is this, "Does it make the contest more fun for
> more people?"
> Jay WS7I 
> 
> 
> ---
> Jay  & Betsy Townsend, WS7I/WV7Y  < townsend@rttyjournal.com >
> Dayton 2003 RTTY Group
> http://www.rttyjournal.com
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RTTY] Post from WS7I, Don Hill AA5AU <=