Waldemar et al. The reasons for one not participating in any event (contest
or otherwise) are as varied as the number usually not participating?
Personally, the passing of QTC's is not the part that lowers my
participation interest, it is the request from other stations (this time
can't blame US stations) for QTC's when I am calling CQ! As AA5AU suggested,
I have an exchanger buffer ending with "NO QTC", however, last year that
still didn't keep stations from asking? I have been associated with
contesting for 20 years, while only 4+ in RTTY, and believe that I have seen
the "best and worst" from many operators? My own personal barometer for a
contest is, after the contest is over, I ask myself "did you have fun"? If I
have to think too long about that, I most likely didn't, and should try to
find the reason, if I care to continue? I have had to personally reevaluate
my reason for participating, as my competitive nature will attempt to
convince me that I didn't "really do well" if I didn't win! Well maybe, I
just "redefined" winning? :)
I will most likely participate in WAE, along with my "beloved" no QTC
buffer, and I will even try to keep a record of how many and which stations
ask for QTC's.
C'Ya, Shelby
----- Original Message -----
From: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>
To: RTTY Contest <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest
> Raj VE6RAJ wrote:
> >
> > "Hill, Don" wrote:
> > >
> > > There were a lot of comments made to the reflector that certain
operators
> > > would be skipping the WAEDC RTTY Contest because they did not care
> > > for the exchange of QTC's.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah:
> >
> > Just because you don't like QTCs shouldn't keep you out of the test. I
> > am not a QTC expert, but as you can only send QTCs to another continent,
> > here is your chance to inflict your pain back on the originators or the
> > contest.
> >
> > 73
> > Raj VE6RAJ
>
> Hi,
>
> for many HAM's the WAEDC is the most challenging DX contest in the world!
>
> I am very surprised to read, that many RRTY OP's, even the "old ones",
> don't like this contest, because they don't understand, what a QTC is???
> I may understand, that SSB OP's don't know, what a QTC is, but a RTTY OP
> should know what a QTC is! Boy, I am really surprised!
>
> If I remember right, the real OM's (OM=Old Man) here should correct me,
> many, many decades ago the mode RTTY was created for one usage only:
> To send QTC's from one point to an other point on this world. If I am
> right, the mode CW was the first mode, which was created for the same
> reason only; just to send QTC's.
>
> If anyone has forgotten what "QTC" means or had not to learn the
> Q-Groups, like QRZ, QRM, QRN, QSY, .. as a part of the license test:
> QTC=Telegram.
>
> See you in the WAEDC-RTTY. The real hard guys you can see in the
> WAEDC-CW; if you still like CW. ~:-)
>
> 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN
> --
> Check RWRL on http://www.qsl.net/dk3vn mailto:dk3vn@darc.de
> RWRL Mirror on http://home.nexgo.de/waldemar.kebsch
> German DX Foundation #207 http://www.gdxf.de
> Big antennas, high in the sky, are better than small ones, low!
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|