To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto |
From: | David Colburn <qrv@kd4e.com> |
Reply-to: | qrv@kd4e.com |
Date: | Mon, 6 Nov 2023 18:53:55 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Section 34 is, more correctly, silent on the matter.FEMA, DMAT, MARS, etc. are not at all silent about their affiliation with Amateur Radio in the USA. On 11/6/23 18:38, Facility 406 wrote: Section 34 explains that Amateur Radio is not considered and emergency service.Can anyone provide a link to when it WAS?I know it was mentioned as an aspect of a hobby previously, but based on the past few years of reaction to this R&O, surely it was more than just that, or, did people just THINK it was?Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Don Kirk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |