RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...
From: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 07:34:59 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Considering I got into EMC while the FCC was still "going to town" on enforcement, and doing its own testing too (complete with IIRC a frog under the 1-meter wooden turntable OATS outside their office), I agree with you. Congress doesn't agree with either of us; if anything costs vendors more to comply with, they'll resist it, and if it is ineffectively or indifferently enforced, they'll ignore it and pay the fines when they must.

That is ONE reason I own my own spectrum analyzers, loop antennas, etc. now that I'm (mostly) retired. It's warming up and I plan on covering a workbench in the barn with aluminum sheet to do lighting conducted emission tests with. Anyone want to trade two 5 uH's and one 650 uH LISN for two 50's?


Cortland
KA5S

On 3/31/2014 7:31 PM, Dale J. wrote:
I don't see as being (or overly) rigorous. Some oversight should be implemented 
by an overseeing agency.  After all, this stuff is being imported, mfg here in 
the US and marketed to unsuspecting consumers, with their safety in the mix to 
boot.

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>