To: | dave@nk7z.net, rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference |
From: | Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:28:48 -0600 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Hi Dave,I used #43 because I had it on hand and it gave a little more choking impedance on 40m than #31 material. The feedline is so short compared to a wavelength that it probably makes little difference anyway. Tom On 3/28/2014 11:48 PM, David Cole wrote: Tom, Why #43, would not #31 be better? If I understand what you are doing, you are removing Common Mode to help the pattern be sharper, is that correct? _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39, Tom Thompson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference, Kenneth G. Gordon |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference, David Cole |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference, Kenneth G. Gordon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |