RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC...
From: CR <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:45:39 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>

When we're cheated by a merchant who sells noncompliant equipment, we have to act ourselves to recover the cost of replacing non-compliant equiment or bringing it into compliance wit FCC Rules.

The FCC can and does penalize those who unlawfully use, import, advertise or sell non-compliant apparatus or equipment.

What it can't do, because Congress won't fund it, is go around looking for interference-producing equipment in use. It must rely on complaints - and it is as we know predisposed to ignore them if acting would anger Congress. Look at BPL!


Cortland KA5S


From FCC Part 15

15.1
(b) The operation of an intentional or unintentional radiator that is not in accordance with the regulations in this part must be licensed pursuant to the provisions of section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, unless otherwise exempted from the licensingrequirements elsewhere in this chapter.

(c) Unless specifically exempted, the operation or marketing of an intentional or unintentional radiator that is not in compliance with the administrative and technical provisions in this part, including prior Commission authorization or verification, as appropriate, is prohibited under section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and subpart I of part 2 of this chapter. The equipment authorization and verification procedures are detailed in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.

From Part 2 Subpart I:

§2.803 Marketing of radio frequency products prior to equipment authorization.

(a) Marketing, as used in this section, includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.

(b) General rule. No person may market a radio frequency device unless:

(1) For devices subject to authorization under certification, the device has been authorized in accordance with the rules in subpart J of this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by §2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter; or

(2) For devices subject to authorization under verification or Declaration of Conformity in accordance with the rules in subpart J of this chapter, the device complies with all applicable technical, labeling, identification and administrative requirements; or

(3) For devices that do not require a grant of equipment authorization under subpart J of this chapter but must comply with the specified technical standards prior to use, the device complies with all applicable, technical, labeling, identification and administrative requirements.




On 3/21/2014 1:20 PM, Kelly Johnson wrote:
What I
don't understand is why the FCC isn't willing/able to put the burden of
fixing it or replacing it on the manufacturer and/or importer.  Why do they
put the burden on the consumer?


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>