David, it still puts the burden of finding, contacting the owner and trying to
get him/her to fix or get rid of the offending device, which in my opinion
should have never been on the shelves in the first place.
I have spent quite a few hours tracking down power line noise and defective
street lights, always I've been successful, but it took me time to do and at
hours when most people are sleeping. Wandering around in darkened streets
looking for a street light blinking on and off. That's all fine and good, but
for me to enter someone else's house and order them around so to speak, like
could you turn off your TV so I can check to see if it's the one that's making
the interference and yes I have done that, thankfully my neighbors are
understanding. Can you imagine me telling them you are going to have to stop
using your TV because it's interfering with my ham radio operation, hi…I don't
think so.
I don't like going into other peoples houses and ordering them around, I
wouldn't like it and I don't expect them to like it either. This is my point,
the junk has to be stopped before it gets in the field. Too late now for me at
least until the TV goes on the blink, but there's a lot of this stuff that is
still in the factory waiting to be shipped OR on the engineers note pad waiting
for the production engineer to rev up the assembly line.
All it would take is one time where the FCC examiner would walk into a big box
store, randomly select a LED light package or dimmer etc, have it tested and
order all that brand of light to be taken off the shelves. After that the
company would spend the 2 or 3 cents or a nickel more and make it quiet. But
its not going to happen. This stuff is going to continue to be imported or mfg
here, sold and enter our neigborhoods, probably even more and worse in the
future.
73
Dale, k9vuj
On 12, Feb 2014, at 10:06, David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net> wrote:
> I would dare to say that most complaints can be resolved without the fcc...
> just the mention of the fcc can be enough to get action from utilities to
> grow light owners. a short explanation of how much interference electric
> fences cause, and how much efficiency they are losing, can get them repaired
> or replaced in days. pointing out that a mast head tv preamp is defective
> and may burn up, or that a door bell transformer may be arcing and ready to
> burn up usually gets them shut off instantly. showing someone that their
> battery charger is using power and radiating even when it isn't charging a
> battery usually gets it unplugged. explaining how much radio frequency power
> something is radiating in this day of total fear of electromagnetic fields
> causing all sorts of disease can be an effective tool, people are afraid of
> milliwatt level wifi and cell phone rf but don't realize their tv is
> radiating hundreds or maybe thousands of times that much right in their
> living room! in 3
> 0 years of policing the bands around here I have yet to have to actually
> contact the fcc to resolve a problem.
>
> I bought 2 different led bulbs years ago at Dayton... Chinese generic
> things... one is still in use and perfectly quiet even with a sw rx with
> ferrite rod antenna right next to it... the other one got sent to the arrl
> lab for dissection as it radiated all over the place, so I lost a few bucks,
> but maybe the arrl got some experience with bad bulbs.
>
> suggestion... for the neighbor with led bulbs that are noisy.. if they don't
> want to return them to the store, buy them old halogen bulbs or find quiet
> led's to replace them and ask for the bad ones so you can send them to a lab
> for testing as they are obviously defective imports that must be reported. a
> cheap investment for years of quiet and good will from neighbors.
>
>
> Feb 12, 2014 10:25:53 AM, dj2001x@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> Now that statement I'll agree with. I will too.
>
> Even if I were to call the FCC to complain would I talk to a live human who
> knows what I'm talking about or would it be a robot that directs me to a FAQ
> on how to deal with RFI.
>
> 73
> Dale, K9vuj
>
>
> On 12, Feb 2014, at 8:12, Roger D Johnson wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, interference to amateur radio appears to be VERY low
>> on the FCC priorities list. I'll probably be an SK long before they
>> act on my complaint!
>>
>> 73, Roger
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|