> -----Original Message-----
> From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Hare,Ed, W1RFI
>
> The interference cases that are now about about 50 and counting
> (although for some inexplicable reason, some of the complainants
> have not reported their interference to the FCC, and some who
> have reported them to the FCC have not informed ARRL so their
> cases can be "counted" in our summary totals), and the process of
> documenting interference will continue, too. The BPL industry
> started out by saying "we will not cause any interference. They
> they claimed that they can correct any interference that might
> occur. Now, from the statements of some in the NPRM, they are
> asking that they be allowed to interfere, or at least that what
> interference they cause not be considered to be "real" interference.
Then they will probably say the interference is real, but the
amateur service is not "critical". Or they're say, go ahead and
sue, and if you win, the monetary damages will be zero (or the
proverbial one dollar), because ham radio is not a business, ham
radio licenses are free, thus there is no "economic loss."
Of course if a ham interferes with BPL, there is a readily identifiable
loss of $29.95 per month, or whatever the rate is.
Rick N6RK
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|