To: | <dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL |
From: | Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com> |
Reply-to: | wrt@dslextreme.com |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:57:49 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:51:16 -0600, <dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com> wrote: >I believe that the most damaging aspect of the article is the reference to >"hobby". I see that term used by so many hams in all sorts of >correspondance, and that is very unfortunate. _________________________________________________________ I am at a loss for an answer. To me and nearly all other hams, it is indeed a "hobby". And to you, that is "unfortunate". I don't even know where to begin. I guess I'll pass. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL, William H. O'Hara III |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams &BPL, David Jordan |
Previous by Thread: | [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL, dgsvetan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams &BPL, David Jordan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |