To: | "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>, "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, kilo.mike@gte.net, "RFI Reflector" <rfi@contesting.com>, "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments |
From: | "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | ka5s@earthlink.net |
Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2003 8:37:27 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Jumping in... BPL seems to be presently treated as a carrier current system for sections 15.107 (NO conducted current limit above 1.705 MHz) and 15.109 (radiated limits). BPL claims (hah) to be an unintentional radiator. Cortland > [Original Message] > From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com> > I am curious, Ed. Is it correct that BPL is classified by the FCC as an > unintentional emitter? I seem to recall reading somewhere in part 15 > that PLC systems are considered unintentional emitters, but it was > never absolutely clear to me that HF BPL systems should receive the > same consideration. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments, Michael Tope |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [RFI] BPL reply comments, Hare,Ed, W1RFI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments, Michael Tope |
Next by Thread: | RE: [RFI] BPL reply comments, Hare,Ed, W1RFI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |