RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Filing Comments to FCC

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC
From: W4EF at dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Thu Aug 7 17:27:54 2003
You stole my thunder, Jim. Equally troubling is UPLC's
assertion in the same comments that BPL is "last mile
solution that doesn't require large head-ends or central
offices". Of course they never get around to explaining
how the data magically gets to their "last mile"
connections. What bullsh%t.

Mike, W4EF................................................

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jimk8mr@aol.com>
To: <n4zr@contesting.com>; <wx5l@charter.net>; <rfi@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [RFI] Filing Comments to FCC


> In a message dated 8/7/03 5:16:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> n4zr@contesting.com writes:
>
>
> > The current filing period is for "reply comments" only.  You can
probably
> > couch your comments as such and get them in -- just be sure to reference
> > one of the power company comments that say "Interference?  What
> > interference?"
> >
> >
>
>
> Look for comments on behalf of the "United Power Line Council", filed July
7.
>  I couldn't get these from the FCC's site, but the copy of the filing at
the
> UPLC web site
>
>
http://www.uplc.utc.org/file_depot/0-10000000/0-10000/7966/conman/03-104+Com
me
> nts.doc
>
> at page 9, includes a real whopper:  "The UPLC is pleased to respond that
> there has been no interference reported in any of the field trials by its
> members."
>
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>