Propagation
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Propagation] PCA polarity

To: "a Propagation Reflector" <propagation@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Propagation] PCA polarity
From: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:37:27 -0500
List-post: <mailto:propagation@contesting.com>
Both magnetic poles and adjacent regions are negatively impacted by polar cap 
absorption.

73,
Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
Retired Space & Atmospheric Weather Forecaster
Plant City, FL, USA
Grid Square EL87WX
Lat & Long 27 58 33.6397 N 82 09 52.4052 W
kn4lf@arrl.net

Propagation eGroup: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation
PropNET Beacon Program: http://www.propnet.org
KN4LF Daily Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf5.htm
KN4LF HF/MF Frequency Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf8.htm
KN4LF Amateur & SWL Radio History: http://www.kn4lf.com/index.htm


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Pnu7t 
  To: propagation@contesting.com 
  Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 12:35 PM
  Subject: [Propagation] PCA polarity


  Hello,
    I have a question.  If Polar Cap Absorption results from high levels of 
  protons, a charged particle, is one pole of the earth affected more than the 
  other.  Should I move to Australia ?
  Steve, NU7T

  _____________________________________________________________
  Great Basin Internet Services Webmail (http://greatbasin.net)

  _______________________________________________
  Propagation mailing list
  Propagation@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation


  ---
  Outgoing mail is certified virus free by Grisoft AVG 6.0.
  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
  Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
_______________________________________________
Propagation mailing list
Propagation@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>