Bill Fisher, KM9P wrote:
>
> I was involved with beta testing CT from version 1.something. I can (I
> believe Kenny would agree) tell you that much of the early success with CT
> was due to cracker-jack team of beta-testers. We used to call Kenny up on
> the phone all of the time and give him bug reports and suggestions. And
> this was not just happening the week before the contest. Also... in those
> days we didn't have neat things like reflectors. Just the phone.
>
> I would suggest that if everyone on this reflector wants to see NA get
> better, that they take it upon themselves to use it BEFORE the next contest.
> Report bugs or suggestions here and let's all get behind it. There is no
> way you can expect Dave & Tim to find every little thing that goes wrong
> with the program. There are WAY too many features and variables to the
> program now.
>
> I suggest that you hook NA up just like you would for a contest. Hook up
> the radio, TNC, and whatever else you normally use. Now operate the
> contest. Make up callsigns to come back to... pass them to other bands...
> spot them on the cluster, edit previously logged Q's, etc... Go through
> every little scenario you can think of that happens during the contest. If
> everyone did this just a few times between now and October, we would have a
> even-more-great program to use for CQWW.
>
> My opinion... for what it's worth.
>
> 73
>
> Bill, KM9P
> ---------------------------------------------
> | Contesting Online... The ultimate |
> | source of ham radio contest information |
> | http://www.contesting.com |
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Submissions: na-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Questions: owner-na-user@ve7tcp.ampr.orgBill,
A very good suggestion indeed!!!!
--
Submissions: na-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Questions: owner-na-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
|