The newer (4.x) code already supports variable length subnet masks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>
To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Terabeam-Hope and input
> I am likewise encouraged.
>
> To us, the only thing we really need, aside from bug fixes, is an
> improved routing module. It would be nice to use subnets smaller than a
> class c on different interfaces on the same device...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dzevad Hadzic" <zex@zex.biz>
> To: "'Norm Young'" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; "'Karlnet Mailing
> List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Terabeam-Hope and input
>
>
> > Well you mentioned karlnet routing and that are is probobly where we
> > all
> > expect more from karlnet. Karlnet routing is absolutly simple once you
> > got
> > into it but very soon you find it's limitations.
> > There si other approach that is also interesting, some people are
> > using
> > Turbocell only as bridge and mikrotik as router.
> > Basicly that means that on every POP you must have mikrotik router.
> > Since the prices of mikrotik router are very afordable I dont think
> > that is
> > bad idea. But I also dont like to have equipment from many difrent
> > vendors.
> >
> > Also I noticed that mikrotik is also developing it's own protocl with
> > polling and packet agregation wich in combination with mikrotik router
> > OS
> > can be very dangerous product if it comes fast enough to the market
> > and
> > before we see some improvments in turbocell routing.
> >
> > But until we see some improvments in turbocell routing and bandwdith
> > shapping i'm afraid that using another router OS is our only option to
> > give
> > custumers services that they want.
> >
> > Oh btw I think that if terabeam want's to have open and healthy
> > relations
> > with custumers then we need to see more similar moves to the direction
> > where
> > last letter from terabeam CEO pointed us. It' was probobly best move
> > that
> > terabeam made since karlnet-ydi merger. And not to mention new webs
> > site
> > with alot's information about terabeam products.
> > Since we all in last few months hade litle good words about terabeam
> > support, products, web site, PR department and all other stuff I think
> > that
> > they with their last moves deserve earn some credibilty.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Norm Young [mailto:lists@applegatebroadband.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:42 PM
> > To: Norm Young; Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Terabeam-Hope and input
> >
> > Er, apologies for the short burst of gibberish in there re:
> > multihop....heck, if it's good enough for Pres. Bush... :)
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
> > To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Terabeam-Hope and input
> >
> >
> >> Here's a letter I sent today to Mr. Fitzgerald:
> >>
> >> Hi Robert,
> >>
> >> Appreciate your efforts to communicate with us Karlnet WISPs about
> >> the
> >> future of Turbocell. I like your approach, but would like to share
> >> some
> >> thoughts with you.
> >>
> >> I've found the KN-50/Wincomm 19dB panel assembly to be a real
> >> competitive
> >> advantage. If I could deploy a/g Karlnet CPE solutions in that price
> >> range ($250-400), it would be an absolute home run. ....
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|