I've been using CF based Karlnet systems for around 2 years now with
Soekris boards.
Besides from that fact that resetting to factory default values is not
available when using CF, we've never had any problems (besides the
inherent software bugs in Karlnet software like unstable ping times
etc.). We've had some occurrences where we had to reload the SW to the
CFs but very rarely.
Loading the SW to the CF can be pain depending on the HW used (old PC,
IDE configuration etc,). So once we've got a stable platform to flash
the CF (using a CF-IDE adapter), we've flashed 10 spare CF units just in
case we needed them immediately (which proved itself to be a good idea
later on)
I have no experience with WRAP boards but Soekris HW is VERY reliable
platform. Never had a single hardware failure in 2 years.
Regards
Noyan Dede
UKS/ Turkey
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Banda
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 10:18 AM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] compact flash
> I'm interested in experiences with turbocell using compact flash. Will
> it work with standard PC or only with approved SBC (soekris, wrap,
> ...)? Any downfalls, problems?
no one?
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|