Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] KN 50 retransmit

To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN 50 retransmit
From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:43:19 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
kn-50's stink
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brendan O'Bra" <brendan@pvbb.net>
To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN 50 retransmit


> bad (RF) cable? Just fixed the exact same thing with new cable :)
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark McKibbin" <mark@team.dcsi.net.au>
> To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:31 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] KN 50 retransmit
> 
> 
> We have just set up a new network so far with 6 clients all with KN 50.
> I have 2 clients with very high retransmit rates (one is about 50%) but
> they have good SNR at both ends infact better than others with virtually
> no retransmits, any ideas?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mark McKibbin
> DCS Internet
> 64 Queen St
> Warragul
> Victoria    3820
> Australia
> www.dcsi.net.au
> mark@team.dcsi.net.au
> Ph. 1300 665 575 (Help Desk)
> Ph. +61 356 241 120 (Direct)
> Fx. 1300 556 595
> Fx. +61 356 220 617
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Dordik [mailto:dordik@presov.viapvt.sk] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:55 AM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: [Karlnet] Orinoco PCMCIA Card differences (noise level)
> 
> I noticed very big "noise level" differences between several (Lucent,
> Orinoco,
> Avaya) PCMCIA cards. I made tests in Client Mode under Linux and
> Windows. Under
> Linux OS i used orinoco_cs driver and wlags49 Agere driver with
> "firmware
> download" feature, so i saw, that results are firmware independent.
> 
> Best results i had with my oldest (SN00UT....) Wavelan Turbo Silver card
> (best
> SNR, because of lowest Noise Level: about -103dBm). I noticed 10dB
> differences
> in Noise level, while Signal Level differences are quite equal with
> tested cards.
> 
> May be this is one reason of performance problems with Turbocell too,
> using
> different "Lucent" cards, which were reported in past.
> 
> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> 
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>