I see about an average of 30 ms with 15 ROR (satellites) talking to 1
COR (base). The average is for all units total. 30% of them actually
return a <10ms response! I am happy with this latency and am
experimenting with VoIP in the network, and getting positive responses.
(I find the only lag over those numbers I get is when a shot is
borderline, a.k.a local SNR under 20, remote (ROR) is over 25. (dealing
with strange COR noise issue...))
Kenneth "Scott" Myers
Wireless Engineer
smyers@telsouth.net
(843) 842-7795 x 105
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
That is awesome. I've got about 5 COR's that I'd like to get to 4.31 or
so.
I'm having some latency issues with the second wireless interface and
I've
heard that the newer FW fixes it?
thanks,
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
> Bob,
>
> That is correct. We will have an announcement about this in the next
> week or so. We are just trying to get the paperwork issue figured
out.
>
> I will post on this list when we have the details.
>
> Kevin
>
> **************************************
> Kevin R. Knuth
> Business Development Manager
> North America
> 260-424-9690 Regional Office
> 614-822-5275 Corporate Office
> kknuth@karlnet.com
> www.karlnet.com
> **************************************
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:27 AM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
>
>
> Whoa....wait a minute.....
>
> You are telling me that I can now "upgrade" at the "upgrade" pricing,
my
> COR/ROR units?
>
> I don't have to purchase the entire license?
>
> -bob
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
> To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:05 AM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
>
>
> > All,
> >
> > What Peter is referring too is getting an upgrade from the COR/ROR
> > version of our software. In the past, when we had a contract with
> > Agere, we were prohibited from selling the upgrade. We are no
longer
> > bound by that agreement.
> >
> > We have added several features to TurboCell since the last release
of
> > COR/ROR, so we have many requests for upgrades.
> >
> > His second point is that he wants to re-flash hardware to add 802.1x
> > functionality. That feature is in our next release (version 4.44)
due
>
> > out WEDNESDAY of this week. (of course, that assumes it makes it
> > through
> > test!)
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > **************************************
> > Kevin R. Knuth
> > Business Development Manager
> > North America
> > 260-424-9690 Regional Office
> > 614-822-5275 Corporate Office
> > kknuth@karlnet.com
> > www.karlnet.com
> > **************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of smyers
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:15 AM
> > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
> >
> >
> > My apologies, but I seem to be missing something. As of this
writing,
>
> > I have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc.
> > indicates their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest
> > release, with apparently no issues. Is this different than the
> > upgrade you speak of?
> >
> >
> > Kenneth "Scott" Myers
> > Wireless Engineer
> > smyers@telsouth.net
> > (843) 842-7795 x 105
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Dordik
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:53 AM
> > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
> >
> > Kevin told us (several months ago), that upgrade from orinoco
firmware
>
> > (COR,
> > ROR) to Karlnet Base and Satellite will be soon.
> > I will be glad, if there will be upgrade for classic AP too (AP500,
> > AP1000) with
> > 802.1x support. Any plans?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > > Good day to you. I have experience in the equipment you mention
and
> > can
> > > offer relation as way to help.
> > >
> > > I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment
> > > running
> > as
> > > a "COR master" (commonly referred to as base in KarlNet lingo),
and
> > > multiple "slaves" (referred to as satellites). Most of the
> > satellites
> > > in the network are 4.15 lucent/Orinoco software, which KarlNet
> > > wrote, and is the predecessor for the current KarlNet software. I
> > > have had both 4.15 base units 4.43 base units working with older
> > > satellites and
> >
> > > they seem to respond well to it, with a common latency of around
> > > 30ms,
> >
> > > and typical throughput of about 3-4 megs.
> > >
> > > Kenneth "Scott" Myers
> > > Wireless Engineer
> > > smyers@telsouth.net
> > > (843) 842-7795 x 105
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Blair Drew
Davis
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:32 PM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
> > >
> > > Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work
around
> > for
> > >
> > > a for a latency and packet loss issue.
> > >
> > > We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use
> > > Lucent hardware for our towers and backbones, and various
suppliers
> > > for our cpe.
> > >
> > > We have a mix of standard lucent software and Karlnet flashes.
> > >
> > > Using Karlnet Turbocell 4.43 as a COR in master mode to talk to a
> > Lucent
> > >
> > > ROR 4.15 in slave mode we get high latency, limited bandwidth and
> > > high
> >
> > > packet loss. Placing the COR into non-polling mode fixed this,
but
> > > limits this to a point to point link, not a point to multi point.
> > >
> > > Moving our equipment around has allowed us to have Lucent talking
to
>
> > > Lucent and Karlnet talking to Karlnet in most areas.
> > >
> > > However, my question is, will a Lucent ROR/COR in master mode talk
> > > to
> > a
> > > Karlnet ROR in slave mode without the latency, bandwidth, and
packet
>
> > > loss problems?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Blair Davis
> > > Computer Adjusters of Allegan
> > > www.computeradjusters.com
> > > (616) 673-0054
> > >
> > > AOL Instant Message Screen Name theory240
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|