To: | karlnet@WISPNotes.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent |
From: | Blair Drew Davis <theory@datawise.net> |
Reply-to: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:31:40 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around for
a for a latency and packet loss issue. We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use Lucent hardware for our towers and backbones, and various suppliers for our cpe. We have a mix of standard lucent software and Karlnet flashes. Using Karlnet Turbocell 4.43 as a COR in master mode to talk to a Lucent ROR 4.15 in slave mode we get high latency, limited bandwidth and high packet loss. Placing the COR into non-polling mode fixed this, but limits this to a point to point link, not a point to multi point. Moving our equipment around has allowed us to have Lucent talking to Lucent and Karlnet talking to Karlnet in most areas. However, my question is, will a Lucent ROR/COR in master mode talk to a Karlnet ROR in slave mode without the latency, bandwidth, and packet loss problems?
AOL Instant Message Screen Name theory240 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] KNE 200 Board Lock up, Kevin Knuth |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Karlnet] Ubicomm Karlnet Clients, Blair Drew Davis |
Previous by Thread: | [Karlnet] Config EV, Blair Drew Davis |
Next by Thread: | RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent, smyers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |