RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?

To:	Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject:	RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?
From:	Peter Dordik <dordik@presov.viapvt.sk>
Reply-to:	Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 19:58:14 +0200
List-post:	<mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>

It is unbelivable. Karlbridge is vulnerable via W32/Blaster? Or any TCP SYN?
What we will do if we will have worm at wireless side?

Peter

>
> Blaster worm, start blocking at your gateway router
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Karlnet] Poling and performing to the lowest denominator?, Timothy Steele Re: [Karlnet] Poling and performing to the lowest denominator?, Madison Computers Re: [Karlnet] Poling and performing to the lowest denominator?, Norm Young [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Peter Dordik Re: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Caleb Carroll RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Dan Metcalf RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Peter Dordik <= RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Caleb Carroll RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Peter Dordik RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Dan Metcalf RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Peter Dordik [Karlnet] Karlnet and Linksys WET-11, Quero Desconto RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Toomas Kadarpik [Karlnet] Two CPEs associating with each other..., Norm Young Re: [Karlnet] Two CPEs associating with each other..., Brendan O'Bra Re: [Karlnet] Two CPEs associating with each other..., Norm Young RE: [Karlnet] Two CPEs associating with each other..., Dan Metcalf

Previous by Date:	RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Dan Metcalf
Next by Date:	RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Caleb Carroll
Previous by Thread:	RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Dan Metcalf
Next by Thread:	RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS?, Caleb Carroll
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]