Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management

To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:06 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
WAIT-

The answer is YES.  BUT- if you have the Wireless on the RG set to 256,
there is no need to set the AP.

Setting the AP would control the total amount of bandwidth at the Base!

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of
helio@compuland.com.br
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management


On 16 Jul 2003 at 7:19, Kevin Knuth wrote:

Ok Kevin, just to clear things up:

If I set a limit of 256K in the ethernet and 256K in the radio slot (RG
Unit)
AND 256K in the AP I'll get 256K each way or lower ?

In the tests I've done on prior releases I got that behaviour...

I supposed that:

1 - limiting 256K on ethernet of the RG will limit to 256K everything
LEAVING the
ethernet
2 - limiting 256K on the radio slot of the RG will limit to 256K everything
LEAVING the
RG by the wireless
3 - limiting 256K on the AP will limit to 256 everything LEAVING the
AP towards the RG.

So I would got 256K both ways (aproximately).

Is that correct ?

Thanks,
Helio.


> The answer to your question is "NO".   Sorry, our bandwidth is just
backward of
> what you would expect!
>
> The engineers are trying to find a way to correct this. This is because
you are
> setting OVER THE AIR bandwidth limitations on the wireless interface-
regardless
> if it is up or download.
>
> Kevin
-
CompuLand ISP Admin
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.compuland.com.br/helio/gpgpublic.txt

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>