Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] quick antenna question

To: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>, "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] quick antenna question
From: "wesley allison" <scgn@pipeline.com>
Reply-to: wesley allison <scgn@pipeline.com>, Karlnet Mailing List<karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:01:24 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
I think I see the light and I will stay with the quality of good cable like
LMR 400 to reduce cable loss. I was wondering is Hyperlink bad?

wes
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
To: "wesley allison" <scgn@pipeline.com>; "Karlnet Mailing List"
<karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] quick antenna question


> think receive side....
>
> and stay away from Hyperlink <g>...
>
> -Charles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of wesley allison
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 9:26 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] quick antenna question
>
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong because I have been learning so much so
fast
> but the Hyperlink's Outdoor amplifiers with Automatic Gain Control (AGC)
> automatically adjust to provide a constant output power regardless of
cable
> length. They are remote-powered and mast-mounted near the antenna. Now let
> me preface this by "That is what they said" so I was under the
understanding
> that I could run some, lets say RG-58 and this amp would take care of my
> cable loss. Please advise
>
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>
> To: "wesley allison" <scgn@pipeline.com>; "Karlnet Mailing List"
> <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 9:12 PM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] quick antenna question
>
>
> > CABLE LOSS my friend......
> > Here is a link so you can see the amount of cable loss for different
> cable.
> > http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cgi-bin/calculate.pl
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of wesley allison
> > Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:57 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: [Karlnet] quick antenna question
> >
> >
> > I have a 2.4 GHz antenna that uses LMR400 cable, standard stuff, but can
I
> > use something else and what are the advantage and disadvantage. I was
> > looking at some old thick net coax cable and I was wondering LMR400 is
> coax
> > cable in a larger scale, so why can't I same a little money on long runs
> and
> > use a smaller coax cable for my antenna's?
> >
> > Wes
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>