Re: [ct-user] CT10.00.001 MS WPX

[Ted Demopoulos <kt1v@demop.com>]

Although I don't remember the details, I ran into a similar issue with a 
M/S for WPX about  2 years ago. What I found was the powers that be 
didn't really care as long as a consistent numbering scheme was used - 
one serial number or two serial number sequences.

I'd ask CQ - not sure who is charge of WPX now, I sort of remember a 
change occurring??

73
Ted KT1V

g3rir demon wrote:

> On looking at the WPX rules for Multi One (same as mult-single?) I
> discover that a multiplier station should use a serial number sequence
> separate from the run station. CT (10.0 I am testing) appears to use the
> same serial number sequence for the mult station as that used by the run
> station.
>
> Can anyone bring any light on this, please
>
> Neil, G3RIR (one of the ops of M2A)
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.577 / Virus Database: 366 - Release Date: 03/02/2004
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
> CT on the web:  http://www.k1ea.com/


_______________________________________________
CT-User mailing list
CT-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
CT on the web:  http://www.k1ea.com/