> Is this a case where CT isn't "smart enough" to figure out a backwards
> spot ?
>
> For example:
>
> normal: DX de N5NJ: 7088.4 RW2F QSX 7188.4
> backwards: DX de N5NJ: 7188.4 RW2F QSX 7088.4
>
Well, "backwards" is relative. If, say, a European station spotted:
DX 7188.4 N5NJ QSX 7088
it might be correct! CT would then have to apply "out-of-band" rules to the
spotted callsign - which, of course, are different in different countries.
Even then, if both of the frequencies were in-band (say DX 28045 ZA1AAA
28065), but were spotted "backwards", CT would be helpless.
The data really needs to be correct as originated.
73
Mike
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|