[ct-user] re CAT CT FT-1000mp

[Larry Crim" <k4ab@email.msn.com (Larry Crim)]

>It seems that we are the only ones getting troubles with the
>communication between CT-9.48 and FT-1000mp

I used 9.48 and FT-1000MP this past weekend during the ARRL DX and didn't
notice any problems at all.

-Larry K4AB


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: Bernard Backaert <bbackaert@skynet.be>; Geovincent@aol.com
<Geovincent@aol.com>
Cc: Tod-ID <tao@skypoint.com>; ct-user@contesting.com
<ct-user@contesting.com>
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 17:37
Subject: Re: [ct-user] re CAT CT FT-1000mp


>
>At 11:59 PM 3/9/00 +0100, Bernard Backaert wrote:
>
>>Dear George and  Tod,
>>
>>It seems that we are the only ones getting troubles with the
>>communication between CT-9.48 and FT-1000mp
>>
>>9.45 and 9.46 work fine
>
>Ken modified the Yaesu code in 9.48 to support the FT-847 (I think, check
>the release notes).  Perhaps there was some adverse side-effect.
>
>73- Jim AD1C
>
>
>--
>Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
>http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ad1c/
>
>
>--
>Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
>WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
>Questions:                owner-ct-user@contesting.com
>




--
Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
Questions:                owner-ct-user@contesting.com