CT-User
[Top] [All Lists]

[ct-user] Oh! No! It's B2R and R2B again . . .

To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Subject: [ct-user] Oh! No! It's B2R and R2B again . . .
From: Joseph Agius" <Joseph.Agius@sybase.com (Joseph Agius)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:15:12 -0500
This problem has been around a while.

What I do to convert to my log program:

1. run ct9_time   -420    against a copy of the bin file.  This sets the time to
7 hours previous.

2. edit the 'res' file so that the date is correct format.  It comes out
01/01/:0 during the gfeneration of the res file.
 I edit the 'res' file to change the ':0" to 00.

3. Import into my logging file which is Mlog.

I like the 'res' generation better than the 'adi' generation because it brings
over the notes.

Joe
WA1WFH




Steve Dove <dsp@hifidelity.com> on 03/07/2000 01:01:56 PM

Please respond to Steve Dove <dsp@hifidelity.com>

To:   "CT-USER@contesting.com" <CT-USER@contesting.com>
cc:    (bcc: Joseph Agius/SYBASE)
Subject:  [ct-user] Oh! No!  It's B2R and R2B again . . .





Greetings fine CT-people,

Are there versions of B2R9 and R2B9 that don't bitch up the times with
files made on CT 9.37?   At the very least it's important to me that the
times in the .RES file aren't fnargled.

With many thanks,

        Steve        W3EEE  /  G3YDV



--
Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
Questions:                owner-ct-user@contesting.com






--
Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
Questions:                owner-ct-user@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ct-user] Oh! No! It's B2R and R2B again . . ., <Joseph.Agius@sybase.com (Joseph Agius) <=